Website traffic statistics
Pages viewed and unique visitors to WCN Online
Month/
year
Page
views
Unique
visitors
May '17809,49122,808
Apr '17600,63723,897
Mar '17664,10026,870
Feb '17511,81924,889
Jan '17597,53831,368
Dec '16692,56026,566
Nov '16672,32528,904
Oct '16558,87820,127
Sep '16528,03820,578
Aug '16482,16818,484
Jul '16461,78816,728
Jun '16452,25720,350
May '16522,07718,502
Apr '16433,09116,773
Mar '16454,71616,488
Feb '16479,59014,371
Jan '16529,85415,815
Dec '15492,60218,837
Nov '15353,00820,085
Oct '15417,35713,005
Sep '15355,91215,297
Aug '15411,40314,704
Jul '15354,72013,342
Jun '15417,67319,164
May '15580,07721,606
Apr '15376,62021,696
Mar '15339,35123,090
Feb '15332,08421,684
Jan '15322,89225,157
Dec '14356,31821,346
Nov '14366,08923,187
Oct '14357,83324,423
Sep '14401,28320,054
Aug '14372,89715,248
Jul '14358,38815,902
Jun '14320,07316,212
May '14388,06821,008
Apr '14341,87020,693
Mar '14313,31919,996
Feb '14271,67916,435
Jan '14200,47419,854
Dec '1393,03315,996
Nov '1392,26117,397
Oct '1389,71817,456
Sep '1394,33018,762
Aug '13102,80416,609
Jul '1382,65216,167
Jun '1388,37417,497
May '13104,17220,211
Apr '1397,46219,191
Mar '13115,84721,047
Feb '13102,19020,176
Jan '13120,44421,077
Dec '12110,79719,692
Nov '12103,45821,428
Oct '1290,41919,012
Sep '1299,50420,003
Aug '12111,41120,782
Jul '12110,15420,259
Jun '12106,61220,830
May '12120,22120,940
Apr '1280,45617,069
Mar '12103,54521,411
Feb '1293,23421,162
Jan '1285,53419,807
Dec '1182,36615,345
Nov '1181,83620,021
Oct '1179,78019,855
Sep '1162,05814,726
Aug '1155,77813,859
Jul '1166,33614,504
Jun '1180,32018,321
May '1184,29219,675
Apr '11194,02719,022
Mar '11127,03417,375
Feb '1165,99614,928
Jan '1167,05315,578

WorldCargo News the world's leading resource for international cargo professionals
CLICK HERE for our FREE weekly eNewsletter
Search: 

Published: 14 March 2016      

More carriers avoiding Suez, says SeaIntel

More Asia-NAEC and Asia-North Europe carriers are opting to sail around the Cape in order to avoid Suez Canal fees, says the Danish maritime consultancy

In a previous Sunday Spotlight, SeaIntel showed that since the end of October 2015, 115 vessels deployed on Asia-USEC and Asia-North Europe services made the backhaul trip to Asia by sailing south of Africa instead of through the Suez and Panama Canals, their routing on the head-haul. Of the 115 voyages, three were vessels on Asia-North Europe, while the rest were deployed on Asia-USEC.

In its latest Sunday Spotlight, SeaIntel has analysed the possibility of carriers switching their head-haul routing to south of Africa in order to avoid the Suez Canal fee. The vessels currently using the route south of Africa on the backhaul have mostly used this option without increasing transit time or dropping intermediate calls (eg in the Mediterranean or Middle East), but have simply sped up vessels on the leg that would otherwise have gone through the Suez Canal.

CEO and Partner in SeaIntel, Alan Murphy, explained: “This is not an option on the headhaul, as all services currently sail so fast on the canal leg that roughly extra 3,100 n/m cannot be incorporated without increasing the transit time between Asia and North Europe, as most ultra large vessels cannot sail faster than 21-22 knots. We therefore examined the economic viability of the south of Africa routing if 3.5 or 7 days were added to the head haul transit time.”

The extra 3.5 days scenario implies that 3.5 days have also been added to the backhaul transit time, making it even more likely that the backhaul voyage will also be switched to south of Africa. The 3.5 and 7 days scenarios require that the carriers deploy an extra vessel per service in order to keep weekly intervals.

Charter prices vary quite a bit, and no efficient market currently exists for vessels above 10,000 TEU, but brokers contacted by SeaIntel normally assume that a vessel costs roughly US$3.5/nominal TEU per day; this covers the building costs, OPEX and the necessary return on invested capital. Thus a 13,000 TEU vessel roughly costs US$45,500 per day.

"[Our] analysis shows that 12 of the 19 dedicated Asia-North Europe services could sail south of Africa on the headhaul if 3.5 days was added to the transit time," said SeaIntel. "The potential savings vary from service to service, ranging from US$7.3M to US$19.4M on an annualised basis, compared to the current routing through the Suez Canal.

"If seven days were added to the transit time on the head-haul all 19 Asia-North Europe services would be able to make the routing south of Africa. On average the carriers would save around US$17.2M per year per service. Combined, the cash-strapped carriers could save US$275M per year.

SeaIntel also noted that an added benefit would be that both scenarios would soak up 19 ULCS, equalling roughly 270,000 TEU. "Such a move would be greatly beneficial for the carriers, as it would go a long way towards restoring the supply/demand balance in the market."


To find out more about WorldCargo News:
  • Click here to order a back issue
  • Click here to subscribe to WorldCargo News
  • Click here for a sample back-issue of WorldCargo News
  • Read related items
    Click on the links below to read other news and features related to this item.
  • SeaIntel
  • SeaIntel Maritime Analysis
  • Publications
  • Container shipping
  • Ship owners and operators - containers


  • All contents © WCN Publishing, 24 Bridge Street, Leatherhead, Surrey KT22 8BX, England.