Filter content by area of interest
Ports & Terminals
Port AuthoritiesContainerBulkBreakbulk/General CargoRo-Ro/AutomotiveGTOs
Cargo Handling Equipment
STS CranesYard CranesMobile CHERo-Ro EquipmentBreakbulk EquipmentLow ThroughputBulk Handling Equipment
Shipping & Logistics
Container ShippingBreakbulk/General CargoRo-Ro ShippingDry Bulk ShippingLiquid cargoesLogistics
TOSPlanning & Optimisation TechnologyWiFiMobile ComputingPort Community SystemsAsset Tracking & Monitoring
Automated EquipmentGate AutomationRemote ControlProcess Automation
RailInland WaterwaysShortsea ShippingRoadAir-Cargo
Container Industry
Container manufactureContainer leasingRepair/StorageTradingConversion/Innovation
Operations/TransportContainer leasingEquipmentM&R/Storage
General cargoProject Cargo/Heavy LiftForest productsRo-Ro/AutomotiveAgribulks
Safety & Security
InsuranceHazardous cargoLashings/SecuringLegal/Regulatory
Civil Engineering
Port & terminal construction/designCivil & Consulting EngineersDredging & ReclamationMooring & FenderingLightingPaving & Surfacing
InsuranceLegal/RegulatoryAppointments/PeopleMergers/Acquisitions/RestructuringFinance/Financial ResultsTrade & Professional AssociationsBusiness/Commerce Miscellaneous
 View all Topics View all Topics A-Z
More View all Topics View all Topics A-Z

You are viewing 1 of your 1 guest articles

register  or  login  for full access to online news

Drewry’s Power dismisses forwarding model

CEO of Drewry Shipping Consultants says liner shipping companies’ trying to cut in on forwarding and logistics to improve their long-term profitability are sailing in the wrong direction.

Linked InTwitterFacebookeCard

Tim Power, CEO of London-based Drewry Shipping Consultants, believes liner shipping companies’ latest business models that are aimed at the forwarding and logistics sectors and designed to improve their long-term profitability are flawed.


In a key note presentation at Intermodal Asia 2019 in Shanghai, Power said: “There are lots of risks to these strategies, not least of which they conflict with these carriers’ existing customers which are the forwarders. Then there are issues with management time and resource. If you do not concentrate on the core liner business and its operations you will be found out. As history has shown this is an unforgiving business.”


He continued: “In my view, the key to profitability in liner shipping is its structure. There needs to be more consolidation. A five company oligopoly would be the answer and the rest of the lines are a waste of time.”


In his presentation, he highlighted that all of the main carriers, including Maersk Line, CMA CGM and China Cosco Shipping had developed business plans and spent heavily to forge a presence in the logistics sector. In contrast, Hapag-Lloyd has stuck with the core business and is focused on improving operations and yields.


“Hapag-Lloyd will, in my view, perform better,” concluded Power.

Linked InTwitterFacebookeCard

You may also be interested in...

Optimisation for SAGT

Optimisation for SAGT

Damen completes first Sendo Liner build

Bertram Rickmers launches feeder shipping company

Capespan sets up firm focussed on logistics

BigLift and CY link up

RCL expands network

Related Stories

Novotrans expands in Ust-Luga

Novotrans, one of Russia’s leading rail operators, has acquired a 100% stake in...

TTS acquisition “postponed to Q3 2019”

MacGregor, part of Cargotec, is still waiting for approval of its takeover of TT...

Containerships introduces second LNG-powered ship

Containerships has taken delivery of its second container ship powered by LNG, C...

ZIM introduces MyZIM personal notification

This new myZIM feature enables customers to receive customized notifications and...
Linked In