Filter content by area of interest
Ports & Terminals
Port AuthoritiesContainerBulkBreakbulk/General CargoRo-Ro/AutomotiveGTOs
Cargo Handling Equipment
STS CranesYard CranesMobile CHERo-Ro EquipmentBreakbulk EquipmentLow ThroughputBulk Handling Equipment
Shipping & Logistics
Container ShippingBreakbulk/General CargoRo-Ro ShippingDry Bulk ShippingLiquid cargoesLogistics
TOSPlanning & Optimisation TechnologyWiFiMobile ComputingPort Community SystemsAsset Tracking & Monitoring
Automated EquipmentGate AutomationRemote ControlProcess Automation
RailInland WaterwaysShortsea ShippingRoadAir-Cargo
Container Industry
Container manufactureContainer leasingRepair/StorageTradingConversion/Innovation
Operations/TransportContainer leasingEquipmentM&R/Storage
General cargoProject Cargo/Heavy LiftForest productsRo-Ro/AutomotiveAgribulks
Safety & Security
InsuranceHazardous cargoLashings/SecuringLegal/Regulatory
Civil Engineering
Port & terminal construction/designCivil & Consulting EngineersDredging & ReclamationMooring & FenderingLightingPaving & Surfacing
InsuranceLegal/RegulatoryAppointments/PeopleMergers/Acquisitions/RestructuringFinance/Financial ResultsTrade & Professional AssociationsBusiness/Commerce Miscellaneous
 View all Topics View all Topics A-Z
More View all Topics View all Topics A-Z

You are viewing 1 of your 1 guest articles

register  or  login  for full access to online news

Iran is no “honey pot”

Lars Jensen, CEO and partner of Copenhagen-based SeaIntelligence Consulting, has warned carriers serving Iran not to expect huge profits and for regional ports to expect a loss in transhipment traffic.
Linked InTwitterFacebook
Speaking at the Container Supply Chain Conference at TOC Middle East 2016, he said: “There will be a rapid increase in the number of services calling at Iran with the Ocean Alliance planning to add several direct calls next year. It means carriers will probably get volumes, but not profitability, as rates will decline sharply. It will be a repeat of the situation in South America three or four years ago.”

And Jensen warned ports and terminals in the region of Iran’s emergence: “If there is a huge influx of carriers, why would you want to tranship containers? It [Iran’s opening up] is a strategic threat to the large transhipment ports, including Jebel Ali, in the region. It also means there is a heightened risk of a significant oversupply of cargo-handling capacity in the ports occurring in the area.” 

He elaborated: “As infrastructure gets better in Iran and its ports’ ability to handle large ships improve, part of the argument for transhipment goes away. I think transhipment will go down in the coming years. This will be compounded by alliances running wider networks and introducing more direct ports of call.”

It is clear that for ports such as Jebel Ali, Khor Fakkan and Salalah which rely on relay traffic, the future is set to be more challenging.

Linked InTwitterFacebookeCard

You may also be interested in...

Hutchison raises rail questions

Crowley selects XVELA

Sails for rockets

CMP/DFDS plug-in

Shore power push in Germany

Tracking in Algeria

Related Stories

Ceyport secures funds to expand

Port has secured US$35M in loans to support its capacity expansion and modernisa...

Thermo King to be part of “Trane Technologies”

Thermo King will be part of Ingersoll-Rand’s new “pure-play climate company.”

Wilhelmsen teams with TTI and Semtech on IoT network

The Wilhelmsen group is to implement a new IoT maritime network featuring the Lo...

Navis acquires Jade Logistics

Adding Jade Logistics’ Master Terminal TOS gives Navis a specialist product for...
Linked In