New report from Dynamar

News-in-print

Netherlands-based maritime consultancy firm Dynamar BV’s latest report in its Ports and Terminals series provides a useful snapshot of infrastructure and equipment at Northern Europe’s leading container ports.

Titled Container Volumes and Terminal Capacity in North Europe II, the publication focuses on 17 European ports in the Gothenburg-Sines range (including UK), where 55 terminals handle Europe-Far East and/or Transatlantic services.

 

Key features include:

  • Throughput of 53M TEU in 2014 (up 5% year-on-year); 80% share of total port volume in North Europe.
  • 16 terminals are equipped with 104 STS gantries to handle 18,000+ TEU ships.
  • 14 ports and 31 terminals handle ships larger than 10,000  TEU.
  • 75 terminals in North Europe’s main ports offer plug-in connections for 51,800 reefer containers.
  • 20 of the 75 terminals use a Navis TOS; Cosmos comes second.

North Europe-Far East and Transatlantic are the two major trades connecting with North Europe. The services of the 18 carriers operating in these two trades call at 17 ports in the Gothenburg-Sines range (including UK). These 17 ports’ collective 5% growth to 53M TEU in 2014 was a much higher year-on-year increase than seen in 2013 and 2012, at 2.2% and 0.2%, respectively. “As matters are, the overall prospects for 2015 are looking a bit less rosy,” noted Dynamar.

As of end-2014, the 55 terminals had a combined box handling capacity of 86M TEU, so the occupancy rate of 62% “may seem to run counter to congestion having plagued so many ports”, the report stated. It added: “The main reason for congestion was, and is, that demand doesn’t come in nice regular identical volumes to be discharged and loaded every day.

“On the contrary, even the largest ships remain prone to the elements, which sometimes cause havoc to schedule integrity. Early in the year, nearly a third of more than 9,900 vessel arrivals were off schedule.  Delayed ships may bunch up in their next North European port, which will work through further in their schedule.

“As such, a certain amount of terminal overcapacity may be considered a requirement to prevent congestion. Terminal capacity is a multiple interpretable subject, but the general  consensus is that congestion kicks in at 75% utilisation.”

 

You just read one of our articles for free

To continue reading, subscribe to WorldCargo News

By subscribing you will have:

  • Access to all regular and exclusive content
  • Discount on selected events
  • Full access to the entire digital archive
  • 10x per year Digital Magazine

SUBSCRIBE or, if you are already a member Log In

 

Having problems logging in? Call +31(0)10 280 1000 or send an email to customerdesk@worldcargonews.com.
New report from Dynamar ‣ WorldCargo News

New report from Dynamar

News-in-print

Netherlands-based maritime consultancy firm Dynamar BV’s latest report in its Ports and Terminals series provides a useful snapshot of infrastructure and equipment at Northern Europe’s leading container ports.

Do you want to read the full article?

Register to continue reading

By registering you will have:

  • Access to all Premium content
  • Discount on selected events
  • Full access to the entire digital archive
  • 10x per year Digital Magazine

SUBSCRIBE or, if you are already a member Log In

 

Having problems logging in? Call +31(0)10 280 1000 or send an email to customerdesk@worldcargonews.com.