Filter content by area of interest
Ports & Terminals
Port AuthoritiesContainerBulkBreakbulk/General CargoRo-Ro/AutomotiveGTOs
Cargo Handling Equipment
STS CranesYard CranesMobile CHERo-Ro EquipmentBreakbulk EquipmentLow ThroughputBulk Handling Equipment
Shipping & Logistics
Container ShippingBreakbulk/General CargoRo-Ro ShippingDry Bulk ShippingLiquid cargoesLogistics
ICT
TOSPlanning & Optimisation TechnologyWiFiMobile ComputingPort Community SystemsAsset Tracking & Monitoring
Automation
Automated EquipmentGate AutomationRemote ControlProcess Automation
Multimodal
RailInland WaterwaysShortsea ShippingRoadAir-Cargo
Container Industry
Container manufactureContainer leasingRepair/StorageTradingConversion/Innovation
Refrigeration
Operations/TransportContainer leasingEquipmentM&R/Storage
Breakbulk
General cargoProject Cargo/Heavy LiftForest productsRo-Ro/AutomotiveAgribulks
Safety & Security
InsuranceHazardous cargoLashings/SecuringLegal/Regulatory
Civil Engineering
Port & terminal construction/designCivil & Consulting EngineersDredging & ReclamationMooring & FenderingLightingPaving & Surfacing
Environment
Business
InsuranceLegal/RegulatoryAppointments/PeopleMergers/Acquisitions/RestructuringFinance/Financial ResultsTrade & Professional AssociationsBusiness/Commerce Miscellaneous
 View all Topics View all Topics A-Z
More View all Topics View all Topics A-Z

You are viewing 1 of your 1 guest articles


register  or  login  for full access to online news

Call for compulsory slow steaming

115 “Shipping companies” and eight environmental groups call for the IMO to mandate slow steaming to reduce GHG emissions.

Linked InTwitterFacebookeCard

The companies and groups have written an open letter to the IMO calling for “mandatory regulation of global ship speeds.” The letter, which was organised by the European Federation for Transport & Environment, notes that the IMO has agreed on an “Initial GHG Strategy for Shipping that calls for shipping to cut GHG by at least 40% by 20210 and by at least 50% by 2050 compared to 2008 levels.

 

After the global financial crisis in 2008, shipping lines adopted slow steaming and, say the signatories, achieved “dramatic reductions in GHG emissions” that highlight how effective reducing vessel speed can be in helping to achieve GHG reduction targets. “However, recent studies also suggest that ships are speeding up again as global demand recovers. Should this trend continue, any GHG gains from slow steaming over recent years will disappear.”

 

To respond to the “urgent need” for shipping to address its contribution to climate change, the signatories strongly support the IMO “implementing mandatory regulation of global ship speeds differentiated across ship type and size categories. Our preference would be to set maximum annual average speeds for container ships, and maximum absolute speeds for the remaining ship types, which take account of minimum speed requirements. Such a regulation should be implemented as soon as possible and the obligation for compliance should be placed both on shipowners and operators, including charterers”.

 

None of the major container lines were signatories to the letter, and the measure is something they would be unlikely to support. Slow steaming was originally implemented as a cost saving measure, but has become an important tool that container lines use to effectively reduce capacity when freight rates fall, and lower costs when fuel prices rise. Vessels also commonly increase speed in peak periods, and to maintain scheduled service times when there are disruptions. Container carriers are unlikely to agree to losing this flexibility.

 

The reduction of GHG emissions from ships is on the agenda to be discussed at the IMO’s Marine Environment Protection Committee (MEPC), 74th session, 13-17 May 2019. France’s delegation to the IMO has already proposed that slow steaming be made compulsory.

Linked InTwitterFacebookeCard

You may also be interested in...

ZPMC moves in

Bunking up the logs for easy moves

Pulp facts to the fore in Montevideo

Hyster clamps up on reel handling

Sizing up the breakbulk market

Getting on the intermodal track

Related Stories

Kalmar Italia and FTMH among winners of 2019 ITALA awards

The prestigious ITALA prizes were awarded during the seventh edition of the bien...

Antwerp and Zeebrugge in merger talks

Antwerp and Zeebrugge are embarking on formal negotiations for an amalgamation,...

Setback for Gateway Basel Nord

The trimodal Gateway Basel Nord (GBN) project, being taken forward by an ad hoc...

MSC gives Northern Sea Route the cold shoulder

MSC says it "will not explore or use the Northern Sea Route between Europe and A...
Linked In
Twitter